NEWS

Press Releases

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 
  • 23 May 2017 7:17 PM | Kimberlee McGenerty (Administrator)

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Contact Katie Kouchakji, press@ieta.org

    BARCELONA, 22 May IETA is proud to release its first Carbon Market Readiness Training Guide, featuring corporate experts who share their market experiences through the Business Partnership for Market Readiness (B-PMR) global outreach.

    The guide, commissioned by the World Bank’s Partnership for Market Readiness (PMR), is aimed primarily at private sector actors in regions where carbon markets are planned or under development. Tackling issues such as offset strategies, competitiveness concerns, risk management, carbon accounting, and internal governance, each chapter was written by a private sector carbon market practitioner.

    Each author also filmed a brief video, highlighting their chapter. The videos are available on both on the training guide’s webpage and YouTube.

    “The BPMR has been helping businesses in developing countries prepare for emissions trading since its launch in 2012, and this guide is the next step in our outreach and educational efforts,” says Jeff Swartz, Managing Director at IETA who oversees the initiative. “We hope these resources will continue to be of use and value for years to come.”

    He adds: “IETA’s membership has a vast and diverse experience with the world’s carbon markets to date, and many valuable lessons to share. This guide draws on their years of being at the frontline of emissions trading and the best practice solutions they have found for their businesses.” 

    “For carbon pricing to be politically and operationally viable, efforts by governments and businesses cannot take place in isolation. We are pleased to be working with IETA’s B-PMR and its member companies to facilitate public-private interaction in countries pursuing such policies,” says Venkata Putti, Manager of the World Bank’s Carbon Markets & Innovation Unit, who oversees the PMR. “The training guide will be used in countries to train tomorrow’s corporate climate champions.” 

    NOTES

    IETA launched the B-PMR in 2012, to enhance the work of the PMR by educating the private sector in countries developing carbon markets. Through its outreach missions, the B-PMR brings representatives from businesses with experience in emissions trading in Europe, the US, Canada and Australia to share knowledge and best practice with local counterparts.


  • 22 May 2017 9:18 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Contact: Katie Kouchakji, press@ieta.org 

    BARCELONA, 22 May – IETA is proud to present its new quarterly publication, IETA Insights.

    As carbon pricing efforts ramp up around the world, spurred in part by the Paris Agreement, IETA Insights will provide a regular update on the latest developments, innovative approaches to the use of market-based mechanisms to cut emissions, and best practice solutions.

    “Promoting market mechanisms remains at the core of IETA’s ethos, and IETA Insights will allow us to shine a light on key developments and new ways of using market forces to fight climate change,” says Dirk Forrister, President and CEO of IETA. “This first edition also sets out IETA’s guiding principles on carbon pricing, and why we still believe market measures are the best tool to cut emissions at lowest cost.”

    Other articles in this first issue include an analysis of the legal options and obstacles for the US to exit the Paris Agreement – a move we oppose. It also offers an economic review of Canada’s national carbon pricing plans, a first-hand update on the EU ETS reform negotiations, and an update on how the aviation sector is rising to the challenge.

    The next edition will be released in July. For more information or content suggestions, please contact Katie Kouchakji on press@ieta.org. For sponsorship opportunities, please contact Lisa Spafford at spafford@ieta.org.


    NOTES

    IETA Insights replaces IETA’s annual GHG Market Report, typically published ahead of the UN climate negotiations towards the end of the year. An editorial committee, drawn from IETA’s membership, advises on the content and performs peer review. The 2017 editorial committee are: Kavita Ahluwalia, Uniper; Evan Ard, Evolution Markets; Jessica Butts, Delphi; Jean-Yves Caneill, EDF; Sophie Lu, BNEF; Mark Proegler, IETA Fellow; Judith Schröter, ICIS; Naomi Swickard, VCS; and Li Yifeng, Shanghai Zhixin. 


  • 07 Apr 2017 2:41 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Contact: Katie Sullivan, sullivan@ieta.org  

    TORONTO, 7 April - A ruling in favour of allowance auctions in California’s emissions trading system is a welcome boost to confidence as it provides market clarity, says IETA.

    The state’s Court of Appeals ruled yesterday that the sale of allowances for California’s cap-and-trade system at auction do not constitute a tax, upholding an earlier court ruling that rejected the claim by the California Chamber of Commerce.

    IETA had filed an Amicus supporting the State position, asserting that allowances are different than taxes in their legal nature. The Court’s ruling found a number of distinctions between emissions trading and taxation, consistent with IETA’s arguments.

    “The purchase of allowances is a voluntary decision driven by business judgements as to whether it is more beneficial to the company to make the purchase than to reduce emissions,” the court wrote in its opinion.

    “The court’s ruling will go a long to increase confidence in the market,” says IETA President and CEO Dirk Forrister. “This allows it to continue as it has been, without the specter of a rollback of auctions hanging over the program.”  

    California’s cap-and-trade program began in 2012, covering large power and industrial facilities, before broadening coverage in 2015 to include fuels. Today, the program caps 85% of the state’s total emissions. In 2014, it linked with Québec’s market and it is expected to link to Ontario’s new cap-and-trade program in 2018. 

    “The Court’s judgement is a significant hurdle jumped," says Katie Sullivan, Managing Director for IETA. “There is a big and welcome sigh of relief – not only among California market participants, but also across current and future North America markets.

    “While there is still the possibility that petitioners will pursue a California Supreme Court ruling, in the meantime we can get back to business with a bit more confidence.”


  • 04 Apr 2017 11:39 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Contact: Katie Kouchakji, press@ieta.org

    BRUSSELS, 4 April The next step in the EU ETS reform process gets underway today, as discussions begin on a compromise package between the European Parliament, the European Council and the European Commission.

    The so-called trilogue aims to conclude before the European legislative summer recess in July.

    Commenting on the start of the talks, IETA’s European policy director Julia Michalak says:

    “We are encouraged by the momentum from action this year in the European Parliament and the Council. We urge policymakers to complete work on the compromise promptly, which will help Europe advance its climate leadership and boost market confidence.

    “Maintaining a strong EU ETS as the cornerstone of Europe’s climate change action agenda must be at the heart of the package, combined with measures to ensure that European businesses do not face a competitive disadvantage in the future.”

    More information on IETA’s position on the EU ETS Reform is available on our website.


  • 03 Apr 2017 10:41 PM | Kimberlee McGenerty (Administrator)

    Contact: Katie Sullivan, sullivan@ieta.org

    TORONTO, 3 April – The Ontario government today published the results from the first auction of allowances for its carbon market, a significant milestone for the nascent program.

    Results from Ontario’s 22 March auction show that all 25.3 million current vintage Ontario Carbon Allowances (OCAs) were sold at a settlement price of CA$18.08. The province also sold 812,000 of 3.1 million future (2020) vintage OCAs at $18.07.

    “The success of Ontario’s first allowance auction is a major landmark for the development of Ontario’s carbon market,” says IETA President and CEO Dirk Forrister. “Auctioning is a transparent way of letting the market set the price, in accordance with commercial needs and the environmental target. We are delighted to see high levels of participation during these early stages of Ontario’s new market, and we expect this momentum to continue as industry becomes acclimated to the market.”

    He adds: “The number one priority for a cap-and-trade system is to drive measurable emissions reductions at the lowest cost. The flexibility inherent in this mechanism allows for each emitter to choose its own strategy and best course of action.”

    Ontario’s cap-and-trade system began on 1 January 2017, covering large emitters as well as fuel distributors and electricity importers. The province aims to link with California and Québec’s regional market in 2018.

    “The key is to focus on the end result of the market, the climate results and reductions achieved,” says Katie Sullivan, Managing Director of IETA. “By allowing trading and linking with similar systems, the overall price of pursuing this goal is even lower. We recognize and applaud this critical milestone of a successful initial auction in Ontario’s carbon pricing journey and fight against climate change.




  • 01 Mar 2017 9:03 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    BRUSSELS, 1 March - IETA welcomes European environment ministers’ adoption of a position on the EU ETS reform, and urges the European Parliament and Council to finalise work on the EU’s carbon market review promptly.

    Environment ministers agreed yesterday evening to double the rate at which the Market Stability Reserve withdraws surplus allowances from the market for five years, and from 2024 onwards to annually cancel a number of allowances held in the Market Stability Reserve. That number would be the difference between the number of allowances in the reserve and the number of allowances put for auctioning the previous year.

    They also approved a decrease in the share of allowances to be auctioned by 2% and agreed that partial compensation for indirect EU ETS costs by Member States is desirable. Such measures further strengthens the protection of European industry against the risk of carbon leakage.

    “IETA is pleased that the Environment Council endorsed measures we have been supporting, such as doubling the Market Stability Reserve intake rate, combined with increased protection for European industry at risk of carbon leakage,” Dirk Forrister, CEO of IETA, said today.

    “As the European Parliament and the Council share views on these key matters we are hopeful that work on the EU’s carbon market reform can be completed soon”.

    “Yesterday’s decision is a big step towards finalising work on market reform that aims to strengthen the system for years to come,” said Julia Michalak, IETA’s EU Policy Director. “The doubling of the MSR’s intake rate will help deliver a smooth transition over time and a better balance between supply and demand."

    “These reforms put Europe in good company. Many other jurisdictions are taking action this year. From California to Korea, China and Canadian provinces, governments are developing their own market programs to deliver their commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and maintain their own competitiveness,” Forrister said.


  • 27 Feb 2017 11:50 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Brussels, 27 February – In advance of tomorrow’s meeting of the European Union’s Environment Council, IETA calls on EU Environment Ministers to strengthen the EU’s carbon market while protecting competitiveness of European industry.

    “We urge the Ministers to agree to a balanced approach that strengthens the EU’s carbon market while safeguarding the competitive strength of European industries and their workers” said Dirk Forrister, CEO of IETA. 

    IETA recommends the EU Parliament and the Council agree to a combination of the following measures:

    • an increase of the intake rate of the Market Stability Reserve from 12% to 24% for a maximum period of five years;
    • a moderate decrease in the share of permits sold at auction, of up to 5 percent, in the event that the cross sectoral correction factor were to be triggered.
    • adequate compensation for indirect costs through coordinated arrangements at Union level and, if necessary, additional compensation by Member States;
    • free allocation of allowances only to sectors at risk of carbon leakage;
    • close monitoring of the functioning of the EU ETS, including interactions with other Union climate and energy policies. 

    “Doubling the Market Stability Reserve’s withdrawal rate for a maximum of five years must go hand-in-hand with up to a 5 percentage point increase in free allocation available to sectors at risk of carbon leakage as well as with compensation for indirect costs handled through coordinated arrangements at Union level” said Julia Michalak, IETA’s EU Policy Director.

    “The current EU carbon market reform occurs at an important time, when many other jurisdictions – from China to Canada, California, Mexico and Korea – are developing their own market based systems to contribute to progress under the Paris Agreement,” said  Forrister. “The reforms will shape the EU ETS for the next decade, when we expect market mechanisms to become the main pricing tool countries use to deliver their climate objectives. This reform will help improve the EU market’s readiness for the future of globally linked carbon mechanisms.” 

    The IETA statement on review of the EU’s carbon market can be found here.

    The statement is complementary to IETA’s views on the European Commission’s revision of the EU ETS Directive for the post-2020 period.


  • 15 Feb 2017 2:06 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    STRASBOURG, 15 February – IETA welcomes the European Parliament’s adoption of a position for negotiations over reform of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, and calls on the Council to adopt its position so the process can move forward promptly.

    The assembly today approved its position on the review of Europe’s emissions market for greenhouse gases. It adopted provisions to double the market stability reserve’s (MSR) intake rate to 24% for its first four years of operation and to cancel 800 million allowances from the MSR in 2021.

    The Parliament rejected a proposed border adjustment for cement imports, which means that the cement sector will continue to receive free allowances in Phase 4. Furthermore, the Parliament rejected increase of the linear reduction factor governing the cap from 2021, agreeing instead that an increase from 2.2% to 2.4% could be considered by 2024 at the earliest.

    It is now vitally important that co-legislators now build on the momentum from the Parliament’s approval and move to the trilogue negotiations as quickly as possible.

    “It’s now up to the Council to adopt its position so that the ETS reform can move forward,” Dirk Forrister, CEO of IETA, said today. “Timing is crucial in order to deliver a clear policy signal to market participants.”

    “If the EU ETS isn’t strengthened, Europe risks a proliferation of unilateral national measures that can add inefficiency and increase costs,” added Julia Michalak, IETA’s EU Policy Director.

    “Market mechanisms are gaining ground worldwide – Ontario launched its carbon market in January, and China will launch the world’s largest ETS later this year,” Forrister said. “Europe needs to retain its place at the forefront of the climate battle by establishing the policy framework for the next phase in the 2020s – using the market to deliver the most cost-effective emissions reductions to meet Europe’s objectives..

    NOTE: The European Council meets at the end of this month. If Member States can agree on a common position, the negotiations between the Parliament, Council and Commission (known as “trilogue negotiations”) can proceed to determine the final shape of the legislation.

     

  • 25 Jan 2017 10:35 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    MEXICO CITY, 25 January - IETA and the Mexican Business Council for Sustainable Development (CESPEDES) today signed a Memorandum of Understanding in Mexico City for the purpose of advancing market mechanisms for greenhouse gas reductions in Mexico.

    Under the terms of the agreement, the local and global business associations will jointly develop a comparison of core policy elements of existing carbon markets, including private sector views on lessons learned and best practices.

    They will further develop a high-level roadmap on the potential scope, framework and operational parameters of a Mexican carbon market, with a view to enabling future linking with other North American markets. 

    “IETA is delighted about cooperating with CESPEDES to bring our global experiences with carbon markets to Mexico,” Dirk Forrister, CEO of IETA, said today. “We look forward to building a strong relationship with Mexican business to help the country achieve its climate targets through carbon markets”.

    Rodolfo Lacy, Undersecretary of Planning and Environmental Policy at SEMARNAT, Mexico’s environment ministry, recognized the initiative and leadership from the private sector represented by CESPEDES and IETA in bringing solutions and proposals for carbon mitigation. “The arrangement sets the table for private sector to take action (on climate change),” he said.

    Commenting on the agreement, Patrick Verkooijen, ‎Special Representative for Climate Change at The World Bank, said: “The Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition aims to build bridges between Governments, civil society, and business to advance carbon pricing solutions to deliver national targets of the Paris Agreement.

    “Today's MOU between CESPEDES and IETA is a breakthrough that shows cooperation in action. The strong local business voice of CESPEDES coupled with IETA's global policy and market expertise will ensure the Mexican government will get the most constructive engagement possible from the business community, as the country moves from ideas to action on carbon pricing."


    Pictured at the signing ceremony for the Memorandum of Understanding are (L to R): Katie Sullivan, IETA; Dirk Forrister, CEO, IETA; Rodolfo Lacy, Under-Secretary of Planning and Environmental Policy, SEMARNAT; Andres Albo Marquez, President, CESPEDES; Jose Ramon Ardavin Ituarte, Executive Director, CESPEDES.




  • 13 Jan 2017 11:26 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    European Union regulators should avoid overlapping policies as a matter of principle, to protect the market effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading System, according to a reflection note from IETA.

    In recent months, there has been considerable discussion into the impact of unilateral policies, such as carbon floor prices and taxes on coal consumption in EU member states.

    National policies often overlap and/or conflict with EU-level regulation. More specifically, these policies have a significant impact on the supply and demand in the EU market, on the functioning of the EU ETS and on efforts on decarbonisation across Europe. They also encourage a fragmented approach to EU climate action that, in turn, creates intra-EU distortions. 

    “Emissions trading has the lowest cost per tonne of CO2e abated compared to other types of regulation. As such, it should be the preferred option to decarbonise the economy in the most cost-effective way,” IETA wrote.

    Moreover, often the impact of national and unilateral measures on the EU ETS is not adequately taken into account. Therefore, greater transparency is needed on whether such policies contribute to turning the EU ETS into a residual policy instrument as emission reductions in the ETS sectors would be achieved not through a well-functioning ETS, but as a consequence of other national policies and regulations, associated with higher costs per tonne of CO2e abated.

    IETA recommends that policy overlap should be avoided wherever possible. To achieve greater transparency, national policies and measures should, as a minimum, be subject to an analysis of their impact on the system, in terms of potential additional emission reductions that they might create, the intra-EU distortions they might cause, and any potential additional costs for achieving such reductions compared to what would have been the case with the EU ETS only.

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >>